To Our Clients & Prospective Clients -- As of March 18, 2020, Starr & Starr, PLLC remains open for business during the current Corona virus (COVID-19) crisis. We remain in communications with our clients by phone, email and our secure file share site. We are scheduling telephone consultations by phone and video chat. At this time the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts, the U.S. District Courts and New York State Court system are all open. We are continuing to file new cases and process our existing cases.

We hope everyone stays safe throughout these difficult times.

Supreme Court Rules Against Junior Lien Strip Off in Chapter 7

Many people in New York and New Jersey have houses that are “underwater” — meaning the current value of the house is less than the value of the mortgage. In the Supreme Court case of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett, – U.S. – , No. 13-1421 (June 1, 2015), the Court ruled that in a chapter 7 bankruptcy a debtor cannot “strip off” or void a wholly underwater junior or second mortgage.

By way of example, if the property was worth $300,000 and subject to a first mortgage of $305,000 and a second mortgage of $50,000, the debtor seeking stip off argued he should be able to strip off or void the second mortgage as being wholly unsecured. The debtor argued that based on section 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code (that provides “[t]o the extent that a lien secures a claim against the debtor that is not an allowed secured claim such lien is void….”), the unsecured second mortgage could be stripped off with the result that the claim of the second mortgage lender would be treated as a wholly unsecured claim.

The Court held, however, that based on its prior ruling in the case of Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), this interpretation of section 506(d) was not correct. The Supreme Court found that in the prior Dewsnup case it had already “defined the term ‘secured claim” in §506(d) to mean a claim supported by a security interest in property, regardless of whether the value of that property would be sufficient to cover the claim.”

Notwithstanding the Bank of America decision, lien stripping should still be available in chapter 13 cases involving wholly unsecured second mortgages. This is because the Bank of America decision did not address chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, and because of the Supreme Court’s prior decision in Nobleman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993). In its prior Nobleman decision the Court held that debtors in chapter 13 cases are prohibited by the anti-modification language in section 1322(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code from stripping off partially secured junior or second home mortgages. The decision has been interpreted by lower courts as permitting lien stripping of wholly unsecured junior or second home mortgages. Lien strip has been permitted extensively in chapter 13 bankruptcy cases.

The attorneys at Starr & Starr, PLLC, have extensive experience and success in representing debtors in chapter 13 cases in New York and New Jersey.

If bankruptcy is an option you would like to pursue further please contact us at 888-867-8165 or by email at info@starrandstarr.com to schedule a free initial consultation.

© 2015

Contact Information